On October 27, 2009 4:06 pm David said:
barefeets: unfortunatly you now know that during the party the cutie in blue gets double-boned and then takes the cumshot to the tits. I like the preview pics, but they shouldn’t show who screws or the cum shots. Takes away from the party itself unfolding. Once again PH is different- you’re not sure who’s going to do what.
On October 27, 2009 9:32 pm barefeets said:
Hi David, maybe you have a little point, i can follow your opinion. Maybe in the next previews of pictures of PH Barbara can take account with your suggestion, so the video is more surprising for you then. But i have not problem with this. 
On October 28, 2009 5:17 pm David said:
Here’s a post reviewing three parties. The current one, plus comparing two past parties, one good, the other not so good, and why.
So question: What makes one PH party better than another one? I think most of us would answer “How many cute ammature babes end up getting naked or having sex”. Or maybe: “Watching a true ammature get into the action”. For sure the answer would NOT be: “Watching a few so-so and few ugly girls get naked and have sex; while 90 other hot chicks stand around drinking and watching”.
MY answer is look at the numbers:
I’ve been catching up with past PH parties. One party that sucked was the one that began on 2009-07-06, labeled “Party Chicks Working those male stripper poles”. I hated it. Why? Look at the numbers:
Only topless: 4 (best is cute blond seen at other parties, part 1 at 30:40)
Blow job only: Just 2, but one is a platinum blond cutie- see pt4 at 17:30-(best part of whole movie), the other is a surpise quick lick at pt4 30:32
Actual screwing (assumes nudity, may or may not be with blow job): 8. They carry the whole movie. Disapointing. Out of the eight three are good looking, three are ugly (fat or really skanky) and two are just regular “Plain Janes”.
Total participators: 4+2+8=14.
Disapointing party, most all participators (9) are first seen in pt1, two are “introduced” in pt2, two in pt3 and only one in pt4. Most disapointing aspect was very little “shirt/bra lifting”. Very hot blond girl wearing grey top, with black bra straps was shown in many scenes (see pt4 at 22:25), but never participated at all- don’t tease the audiance. Part 3 and 4 sucked over all (good cum scene with platinum blond).
The movie sucked. Compare that party with the one that began on 2009-04-13 labeled “Full On”:
By the Numbers
Topless only: 8
Blow job only (no nudity): 8
Blow job with nudity: 7
Actual screwing (assumes nudity, may or may not be with BJ): 7
Total participants: 30
16 girls “introduced” in pt1
5 girls “introduced in pt2
7 girls “introduced in pt3
2 girls in pt4.
Notice the number of new participants in pt3 (none by Erik).
1st blond girl topless is way way hot- used in promo shot by Eromaxx. Too bad they didn’t have her participate more later. Ms Skinny continued to dissapoint.
THAT WAS A GREAT PARTY! The reason is clear, they had way more girls participating, including a lot more hot looking babes. 30 girls vs 14. If the producers at Eromaxx decided to use some real incentive to get more girls involved, EVERY party could a winner- and that would mean more satisfied members spending money at Eromaxx.
Once again its so simple: have two “Grand Prize” drawings for decent gifts. The girls enter the drawings by eithier getting topless or getting “hardcore”. If you go topless you are entered for the “nudity only” gift. Go hardcore and you are entered for the more expensive “Hardcore” gift. A girl could enter both. Keep the “paid performing girls” to ensure SOMEONE has sex, but then have the drawings to intice more ammatures to “get wild”. Anyone out there agree with me??? PH can be so good, and other times so disapointing!!
By the numbers for Pt1 of current party: Over all not too great a party so far. First stripper not good at the spontaneous “shirt lift” or “quick suck” technique.
nude only: 3
Blow job only: 2 (niethier girl cute at all)
Blow job and nudity: 6: only one cute- at 8:36, blond with pink top.
Total participants: 11
No “knock-out” participants yet. Some good looking girls in crowd, but probably just watchers. I would like to see the girl in grey shown at 23:47, but she’s in the “don’t touch me” section. Have to wait and see part2.
On October 29, 2009 8:10 pm Abu said:
I totally agree with you, David. The key to a great party is clearly that CUTE amateur girls are getting erotically/sexually involved, the prettier the better.
even if they are “just” kissing a stripper with full clothes on but with such a tenderness and enthusiasm, leaning closely towards him and seeming to forget everything around them…
I’d rather see this than watch a hundred plain janes fucking with 5 guys each at the same time. well.. i’m getting absurd, but i hope you get my point.
rough and emotionless fucking so find everywhere on the net. But a devotional and tender blowjob or handjob while kissing of a cute amateur girl is much rarer.
Anyway, it occured to me sometimes that I find a girl in a party cute as long she is kissing, giving handjobs and such – until she starts fucking. Then I start to think: Well she’s actually not THAT cute… strange phenomenon…
So I’d say I have the following expectations towards a party, highest priority first:
1) “cuteness”
2) “soft hardcore” (i.e. kissing, handjobs, blowjobs etc..)
3) hardcore action
4) unpredictability
5) high number of the points above
On October 30, 2009 12:33 am guffybear said:
well they must do something good in the pre party warm up, which we do not get to see, judging by the preview pictures of a few parties ago.
there was one girl in the pictures on the blog, tits out, but she did nothing in the actual party.
either show the warm up or extend the incentives to the party
On October 30, 2009 2:05 pm David said:
Abu, I agree with you, especially about “plain Jane” being double teamed- no intrest in seeing that. But kissing is always better if the cute girl is at least semi-naked (topless), also I would consider a blowjob hardcore.
Guffybear, you are refering to the “beer down the breasts” girl I was asking Barbara about right? That was disapointing not seeing her do ANYTHING in the actual party. I never did get an answer about why they couldn’t include the pre-party in the update or as an extra on a DVD.
I wonder that maybe Eromaxx has a variable budget for these parties. A large budget when you see many girls participate and a smaller one when only a few carry the whole four updates.
No opinions about my above idea of a door prize? Whatever they pay the girls to get naked or have sex, incorporating prizes of a greater value would intice more “ammatures” to join in.
On October 31, 2009 2:13 pm Steve W said:
Despite what others think, I enjoy PartyHardcore & I have many of PH DVD’s. I like the fresh faces of the amateurs girls, and thats what some people have to remember! they are amateurs!! I like the unpredictability of the girls and seeing how far they are willing to go on their own accord, and also knowing that they are not professionals and that they are everyday girls you see on the street, that has always been my fantasy.
If the guys don’t like it then watch MSP or DSO for the professional models. Please keep PH going, I think Eromaxx is doing a great job and I enjoy them.
On October 31, 2009 9:01 pm lez lover said:
There is ONE reason why I posted at this blog, instead of the content at PH, and male strippers on the stage : in the previews of eromaxx, there are a lot of plain Janes all around the stage.
There is also a (big) lack in your proof, David : you didn’t consider the integral calculation in time – each modelxtime of her show-.
This variable can modify your analyse in a large proportion.
On November 1, 2009 9:12 pm nsm said:
i would like go to this party. How can i do it???
On November 2, 2009 10:01 am emphphem said:
The bald stripper seems to be getting better, but not at stripping. He is getting better in the 3rd and 4th episodes because he is getting more amateur action. I would suggest moving him to waiter rather than have him strip.
On that note, if he does strip, then I would put him as the 2nd stripper and not the 1st. Reason being, Neo is the best stripper by far and it would be best if he was out in the party the longest.
Once again, Erik should go. He has brought nothing to PH in the last 1 1/2 years and, although he was great at one point, he is not anymore, regardless of the reason. However, I suspect this suggestion will be ignored, as it has been for the last 6 months. I realize Erik is a producer for PH, but someone higher than him needs to step in and get him out of there.
Other than that, the 1st episode was different than usual. I don’t think it was as good, but I think it could be setting up for a good 2nd episode. And we already know what the 3rd episode will consist of.
As for the preview pictures. I guess I would rather see non-action shots, it leaves it more of a mystery. Maybe at least one crowd shot to get a feeling of what all the girls look like at the party.
On November 2, 2009 11:25 am Abu said:
@David:
I consider a blowjob to be hardcore also but not to the same extend as having sex, therefore I called it “soft hardcore” to differentiate… (but kissing should be another category, i know… )
I agree with you that a topless/naked cute girl is of course more exiting than a fully clothed one but I’d say that I prefer a cute girl with all clothes on to a naked one which I dont find beautiful at all (e.g. 90% of american female pornstars)
A “plain jane” (why jane?) could run around the whole party and blow/fuck every stripper, waiter and cameraman (!)a dozen times over, I wouldn’t care. Well, actually I would care. I’d get sort of angry that the camera focusses permanently on her fucking for the fifth time instead of trying to film the one certain amateur girl which -after her fifth or so party- finally decides to give Christos a handjob…
that brings me to your point of the incentives: I like your system with two prize categories, or the variant that a certain amount would be donated to a humanitary organization if a girl does a certain thing.
I’m sure that would motivate more girls to become more “brave” (Which I would appreciate a lot!)
Considering prizes I can see some difficulties, however: How to efficiently prevent abuse or check who earns which prize?
One could face situations like: “I showed my left breast for 13 milliseconds, I want do get that signature of Robby Williams!” Or: “My lips touched his cock, I swear! It’s a blowjob then!” “Well, let’s find out by looking over the whole party material in slowmotion… Come here again in a week’s time and we’ll give you that chanel no.5 perfume sample if you prove to be right!”
I find it a great system, but one the realisation would still have to be thought out seriously to prevent problems… But definately worth considering!
On November 3, 2009 6:52 am David said:
correction on current party pt1 numbers. nude only:2 blowjob only:1 Blowjob/nudity:8 Total participants was correct at 11.
Connection here too slow to download video of PT2, but from photos, I’m guessing 8 new participators in pt2. Four girls from pt1 now having sex. A couple of new cuties (photos 206 and 219)the rest so-so. Total participants so far: 19. I’ll see the video soon
On November 3, 2009 12:53 pm Barbara Summer said:
Sorry nsm, there are none of guys invited to join PH, because it is ladies party! Barbara
On November 3, 2009 2:05 pm lez lover said:
“there are none of guys invited to join PH, because it is ladies party! ”
Dear Barbara,
I really cross my fingers about one point : let your female boss (who is chargé-d’affaires at MW and/or AWAM, if I am right) ask you to stick a notice header at your next upcoming site : “No guy(s) inside”
On November 3, 2009 4:18 pm David said:
Lez Lover: You are right I didn’t consider time. But that was intentional. It would be too much (even for me) to calculate how much time each model is shown. Instead I chose just to point out that the better parties involve more girls. Certainly you could have a party where there are 30 participators, 29 of which are shown for shown for one minute each, and number 30, a ugly fat chick is shown for 1 hour- Not a very good party indeed. That’s up to the editor. Of course having multi-cams would allow the viewer to more readily choose how long to view each girl. But I won’t even go down that road anymore!!
Abu: A while back I posted the idea of “PartyHardcore Prize Series”. It’s archived somewhere in this blog. Here’s a section of it that addresses your point of how earning prizes and preventing abuse.
THE ANNOUNCER/PARTY HOST:
“Our grand prize drawing tonight is for a new Flat Screen HD TV valued at $1000. Some lucky girl will walk home with it tonight, but to enter she’s got to be willing to “party”. All the girls are wearing plastic braclets. Girls with red braclets have already agreed to “party hardcore” to some extent. To what extent we’re not sure , watch and find out! Other girls are wearing green braclets with a detachable unique number. These girls are not “professionals” in any way, they are just your next door girl types, coming in to have a good time, see the show and maybe walk home with a nice prize. To have a chance at winning our grand prize the girls with green braclets will have to show us their dirtiest dance moves along with some skin. When they do, our photographer or waiter will detach their number and enter it in the box for the big drawing at the end of the show.”
It works like this. The strippers and/or cameramen get a girl to get naked, and show herself for the camera. The cameraman/stripper then detachs part of her braclet with her number on it. The cameraman/stripper then takes that number and puts it in a box for a random drawing at the end of the party. The girl who’s number is drawn is the winner of the prize. Girls who don’t do anything never get thier number detached and entered. Simple.
I also had another idea for hardcore participators in the form of a “prize pile”. That would be more difficult to manage. Since then I’ve thought why not just have two detachable numbers on the girls braclets. One for entry into the “nude only” prize. Then the second number for entry into the Hardcore prize.
Abu, you are probably right about girls flashing tits or sucking for millisecond periods. In that case the stripper/camerman would just have to say “no-no, you want me to take your number, you’ll have to show just a BIT longer….”
Steve W, you are like the dad of a kid at a baseball game. The kid could suck at hitting and fielding, but no matter what, you would be in the stands cheering him on. I don’t think you’ve ever had a negative comment about PH or Eromaxx. They must love you.
On November 4, 2009 1:03 am guffybear said:
Steve W
i do not think anyone on this thread is criticising PH, they are making suggestions/floating ideas on how to make it better for the subscriber. after all we are paying for this product.
David has tried alternative sites but has returned to Eromaxx because it is better, something he admitted to in a previous thread. however that is no reason not to try and improve the product as opposed to rsting on one’s laurels.
compare your television, computer or car with one of from 10 years ago. those manufacturers wanted to get better and so should eromaxx
On November 4, 2009 6:43 pm David said:
Thanks guffybear. PH is like the kid at school. A “C+” student that with only a little bit more effort could be an “A”. There’s beens lots of good suggestions by many people on this blog. Hopefully someone involved in PH production, other than just Barbara, is reading these and will implement at least some of the ideas. Not too many companies get such detailed consumer info.
I watched the video today. Current party part2 notes:
10 new participants “introduced” (actually a good number)
nude only:4
Blow job only:1
nude and blow job:2
sex:2
nude/lesbian:1
Of these, three were “cuties”. Here are some thoughts about part2.
Tell the camera-men to be careful not to pan away from Mr. Flag guy (Nero) as he’s interacting with a girl to lift her shirt or get a blowjob. Take a look at 15:25, Nero is starting a shirt lift, but then the camera pans away, when it pans back at 15:49, the girl is “under the flag”- what happened? Remember it’s not just porn, PH tells a story.
What’s up with the blond cutie in the black top/white pants (bottom photo above)? Photos of her topless here and in the part2 photo download, but no video? Part2 video showed her friend in black giving Nero a blowjob. Maybe there’s hope for part3 or 4.
There were absolutely no panning or face shots of the cute blond in blue(shown getting the cum shot above) before her first sex shot. The first we see of her is a “gyno” shot of her pussy at 23:56. Once again it’s not just porn, it’s a story. In fact PH would be better if there were less time spent in close-ups of “insertions and pounding” and more time showing more girls getting involved in the action.
Still hoping for “grey girl” shown at 17:29 and 25:19 to get involved, but I don’t think there’s much chance.
Erik is probably comming up in part3 now. The girls seem to like him. It’s ok he doens’t want to do any sex now, but he needs to be more like Nero and do some “shirt lifting”.
On November 5, 2009 2:24 pm Abu said:
my personal favourite of this party is definately the black haired girl interacting with Neo at 20.33 and 33.21. He seems to be able to convince her to anything.. so I’m optimistic for episode 3 and 4
I think that Christos Mighty is doing a great job also in lifting tops and envolving amateurs. He and Neo should have their own cameramen 
On November 5, 2009 2:25 pm Abu said:
oh i forgot to mention, i am referring to episode 2 with these time indications…
On November 5, 2009 10:25 pm David said:
Abu I totally agree with you about the black hair girl. Her reaction at the 20:40 mark about Nero’s “suggestion” was great. But given that reaction, the chances of her doing “more” seem slight. She’s the highlight of the party so far.
On November 6, 2009 5:19 am guffybear said:
where was the girl in the bloe top in part 1 ?
not a pro shipped in ny eromaxx to add to the action i hope.
also where has the dancing girl in part 1 gone ? even though she had pantyhose and kniockers on under her shorts, she had a great arse and why should she stop showing off so soon ?
not another eromaxx plant surely ?
On November 6, 2009 7:55 pm David said:
guffybear, you are asking the same thing I did above. Again, the first shot we see of her is her pussy in pt2 at 23:57. I think she was in the crowd in Pt1, but the cameraman/editor combination missed her completely. Once again, if you’re going to use a “pro” at least show her face a bit before she gets down to “business”. (I’m certain anyone who starts off getting double-teamed is due to prior arrangement with Eromaxx).
Speaking of “girls in blue tops”, how about the cutie with dark semi-curly shown in pt1 photos 127&130? She’d be great to see do some action. Same with the blond wearing glasses in the blue top. Her freind showed some breast, maybe eventually she will too.
Abu: “I think that Christos Mighty is doing a great job also in lifting tops and envolving amateurs. He and Neo should have their own cameramen”. Absolutely, just wish they could offer something more to the girls than just sayin “please PLEASE let me lift your shirt”! How about “There’s only four girls so far in the drawing, now here’s YOUR chance”!! Right?
On November 10, 2009 7:35 am joe said:
no updates in ph yet?
On November 10, 2009 3:01 pm Barbara Summer said:
Hi Joe, Party Hardcore is updated from last night, if you have some technical problem, please contact Eromaxx customer support. Barbara xx
On November 10, 2009 4:03 pm Marcello said:
Barbara – From the last party before this one, the black haired girl you wrote about in the PH update and liked so much (saying she could be a professional)…she was very beautiful indeed. Was she interested in doing more? Will we be seeing her in anything else?
On November 10, 2009 4:31 pm Barbara Summer said:
Hi Marcello, yes I saw she’s got great involved, looks wonderful, but I have no informations so far about her, what she is willing to do, just future will show ! Barbara xoxo
On November 10, 2009 6:29 pm David said:
Ugg! What a loser pt3 update is to the current party. Only two new girls participated. One BJ by a fat blond at 10:58 and a tit flash by a cute blond at 14:30. Other than that all repeats by the designated performers, mostly the blond photographed above taking the pop shot. Lots of generic dance shots. Nero was at least trying, at 15:48 he attempted a shirt lift with the “grey girl” I like and the very cute bruenette next to her. Both girls said “no”, it was the only exiciting part of the update. Still have not seen video of the tit flash by the cute blond in black top/white pants shown 3rd from bottom above. Big miss if it’s not seen in pt4.
Over all Erik continues to disapoint (just use him for the warmup). And BTW, what’s up with that guy? I thought he got married or something and wasn’t going to participate in sex at the parties anymore. At 11:50 it clearly shows him getting a blow job. I guess he must figure like Bill Clinton, that a blow job doens’t count! Part4 update next week hopefully will be better.
On November 11, 2009 7:01 am Ryan said:
Who is the bald guy on the first picture? Where can I find more vids of him?
On November 11, 2009 11:19 am Barbara Summer said:
Hi Ryan, well, which guy, there are more guys then only one. Barbara
On November 11, 2009 5:22 pm David said:
Barbara, I’m sure Ryan means the bald guy in your preview photos above holding the girl in the “lepord top” shirt. Which BTW, that guy is way too timid with the girls. Unlike Nero and Christo who achive much more from the ammatures.
On November 17, 2009 6:00 pm Pepe said:
Is there anything interesting going on in the fourth part? My membership expired just before it’s release. Especially with the the girl shown on the second picture here. The one with a tattoo on her arm. More with the girl from the seventh/last picture who was dancing most of the time so far would be nice, too. She seems familiar. Has she been at an earlier party already?
On November 18, 2009 6:50 pm David said:
Pepe, I wasn’t going to review part four because this blog is so far “back” in the stack now I didn’t think anyone was reading here. But since you asked, I’ll let you know what I saw.
The cutie in blue in the second photo from top, did show a bit of breasts, and she should be proud, beause they are very attractive breasts. She’s a cute girl. It actually was the best part of part4. Christo tried to get her to go further but the answer was “no”. The last moments in the vid was Christo interacting with her again, there should have been more of that earlier.
The cute blond with the black top and white pants (last photo above). Did show her right breast with Christo. I got excited because her dark short-haired freind had given a blowjob earlier. For a moment it looked good, maybe a double BJ with both of them. But no, only the dark haired girl blew Christo to a pop-shot. Cutie blond just moved away. It was disapointing they missed the video of Ms Blond and Nero in the earlier updates.
Over-all this party is at the lower end of the list. Too many cuties in the crowd that never got in the action. Too much on the one blond in blue (pop-shot to the breasts in photos above), she carried the whole show. Hopefully the next party will be better.
On November 18, 2009 6:57 pm David said:
Also Pepe, about her (blond in last photo/#7 above): I don’t think I’ve seen her before. guffybear and emphphem are probably better than me in picking out faces from past parties. If they are reading this, maybe they can answer.
Oh, also photo #4 from top shows what I was talking about above (ms blond not getting involved in a bj).
On November 19, 2009 2:04 pm Pepe said:
thanks
On October 26, 2009 8:45 pm barefeets said:
Great pictures, the cumshot on the tits, amazing, i love that al the time!